Antigua and Barbuda vs Costa Rica: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0031 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.0032 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
80th
Costa Rica rank
78th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Costa Rica
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0032 kt per square kilometre against 0.0031 kt per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 80th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 170 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0033 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0032 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 0.0032 kt per square kilometre against 0.0031 kt per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Costa Rica?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Costa Rica rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 80th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Costa Rica: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/costa-rica/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Costa Rica: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.