Central African Republic vs Iceland: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.0006 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
150th
Iceland rank
153rd

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Iceland
0000.001196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0006 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 150th and Iceland ranks 153rd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Iceland?
Central African Republic, at 0.0006 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Iceland?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 150th and Iceland ranks 153rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Iceland: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/">Central African Republic vs Iceland: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.