How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nauru vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP (unit)

Nauru

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Nauru rank

63rd

Zimbabwe rank

61st

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP (unit) over time

Nauru
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Nauru, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Nauru ranks 63rd and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nauru	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Nauru
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Nauru
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq), per unit of gdp, Nauru or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq), per unit of gdp between Nauru and Zimbabwe?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq), per unit of gdp?: Nauru ranks 63rd and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-per-unit-of-gdp/naoero/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-per-unit-of-gdp/naoero/zimbabwe/">Nauru vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 170 places, 9,139 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 17 August 2026

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.