China, Macao SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Manure Management — Emissions (N2O)

China, Macao SAR
0.0047 kt
in 2050
Equatorial Guinea
0.0044 kt
in 2050
China, Macao SAR rank
216th
Equatorial Guinea rank
217th

Manure Management — Emissions (N2O) over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196120052050

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 0.0047 kt against 0.0044 kt in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0003 kt.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 216th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 217th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 kt 0.0018 kt 0.0013 kt Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0007 kt 0.0021 kt 0.0015 kt Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0008 kt 0.0024 kt 0.0016 kt Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0008 kt 0.0028 kt 0.002 kt Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0012 kt 0.0032 kt 0.002 kt Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0013 kt 0.0035 kt 0.0022 kt Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0013 kt 0.0037 kt 0.0024 kt Equatorial Guinea
2030s 0.0026 kt 0.0037 kt 0.0011 kt Equatorial Guinea
2050s 0.0047 kt 0.0044 kt 0.0003 kt China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions, China, Macao SAR or Equatorial Guinea?
China, Macao SAR, at 0.0047 kt against 0.0044 kt in Equatorial Guinea as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions between China, Macao SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0003 kt, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Macao SAR and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for manure management — emissions?
China, Macao SAR ranks 216th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 217th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Manure Management — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/equatorial-guinea/">China, Macao SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Manure Management — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf