Belgium vs Eswatini: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Belgium
0.291 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.3077 kt
in 2050
Belgium rank
140th
Eswatini rank
139th

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Belgium
  • Eswatini
00.10.20.30.4196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.3077 kt against 0.291 kt in Belgium, a difference of 0.0167 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 140th and Eswatini ranks 139th of 228 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3426 kt 0.2041 kt 0.1385 kt Belgium
2010s 0.3049 kt 0.2155 kt 0.0893 kt Belgium
2020s 0.2732 kt 0.2082 kt 0.065 kt Belgium
2030s 0.3128 kt 0.265 kt 0.0478 kt Belgium
2050s 0.291 kt 0.3077 kt 0.0167 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — indirect emissions, Belgium or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.3077 kt against 0.291 kt in Belgium as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — indirect emissions between Belgium and Eswatini?
0.0167 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2050.
How do Belgium and Eswatini rank globally for manure management — indirect emissions?
Belgium ranks 140th and Eswatini ranks 139th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Eswatini: Manure Management — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/belgium/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/belgium/eswatini/">Belgium vs Eswatini: Manure Management — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf