Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Mauritania: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
3.9 kt
in 2050
Mauritania
3.86 kt
in 2050
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
56th
Mauritania rank
58th

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Mauritania
12345196120052050

How they compare

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 3.9 kt against 3.86 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 0.04 kt.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 56th and Mauritania ranks 58th of 228 countries.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.64 kt 1.37 kt 0.2719 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1970s 2.25 kt 1.16 kt 1.09 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1980s 2.58 kt 1.22 kt 1.36 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1990s 2.68 kt 1.5 kt 1.18 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2000s 3.36 kt 2.05 kt 1.31 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 4.08 kt 2.38 kt 1.7 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2020s 4.49 kt 2.58 kt 1.91 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2030s 3.7 kt 3.14 kt 0.5536 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2050s 3.9 kt 3.86 kt 0.0429 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — indirect emissions, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Mauritania?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 3.9 kt against 3.86 kt in Mauritania as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — indirect emissions between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Mauritania?
0.04 kt, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Mauritania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Mauritania rank globally for manure management — indirect emissions?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 56th and Mauritania ranks 58th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Mauritania: Manure Management — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/mauritania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Mauritania: Manure Management — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf