Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Pakistan: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
147.75 kt
in 2050
Pakistan
21.94 kt
in 2050
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
9th
Pakistan rank
9th

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Pakistan
050100150196120052050

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 147.75 kt against 21.94 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 125.81 kt.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 6.7 times Pakistan's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 33 groups.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 49.19 kt 3.96 kt 45.23 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 56.29 kt 5.69 kt 50.59 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 65.12 kt 7.76 kt 57.36 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 78.88 kt 10.33 kt 68.55 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 103.95 kt 13.08 kt 90.87 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 139.29 kt 17.49 kt 121.8 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 165.12 kt 21.68 kt 143.43 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2030s 117.31 kt 18.01 kt 99.3 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2050s 147.75 kt 21.94 kt 125.81 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — indirect emissions, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Pakistan?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 147.75 kt against 21.94 kt in Pakistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — indirect emissions between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Pakistan?
125.81 kt, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Pakistan?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for manure management — indirect emissions?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Pakistan: Manure Management — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/least-developed-countries-ldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/least-developed-countries-ldcs/pakistan/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Pakistan: Manure Management — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf