Cuba vs Eswatini: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Cuba
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
33rd
Eswatini rank
36th

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Eswatini
00000196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 36th of 170 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Cuba or Eswatini?
Cuba, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Cuba and Eswatini?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 36th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Eswatini: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/eswatini/">Cuba vs Eswatini: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.