Panama vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Panama
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
78th
Zimbabwe rank
77th

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 170 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Panama and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.