Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP

Sao Tome and Principe
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Serbia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
110th
Serbia rank
108th

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Serbia
00000197019962023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 108th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Sao Tome and Principe or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia rank globally for manure management — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 108th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-unit-of-gdp/sao-tome-and-principe/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-unit-of-gdp/sao-tome-and-principe/serbia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,139 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.