Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Marine protected areas

Latvia
16.4%
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
3.7%
in 2025
Latvia rank
36th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
33rd

Marine protected areas over time

  • Latvia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
51015201320192025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 16.4% against 3.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 12.7%.

That makes Latvia's figure about 4.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 33rd of 174 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 16.4% 3.0% 13.4% Latvia
2020s 16.1% 3.7% 12.5% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher marine protected areas, Latvia or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Latvia, at 16.4% against 3.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in marine protected areas between Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
12.7%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for marine protected areas?
Latvia ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 33rd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring, published as Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Marine protected areas. Statizoid, drawing on Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/marine-protected-areas-percent-of-territorial-waters/latvia/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/marine-protected-areas-percent-of-territorial-waters/latvia/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Marine protected areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters)
Unit
% of territorial waters
Source
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 2,834 data points, 2013–2025
Last refreshed

Marine protected areas are areas of intertidal or subtidal terrain--and overlying water and associated flora and fauna and historical and cultural features--that have been reserved by law or other effective means to protect part or all of the enclosed environment.