Hungary vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Hungary
15.68 kt
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
13.3 kt
in 2023
Hungary rank
29th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
30th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Hungary
  • Trinidad and Tobago
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 15.68 kt against 13.3 kt in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 2.38 kt.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 29th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 30th of 59 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2010s 13.38 kt 13.45 kt 0.0703 kt Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 16.3 kt 13.16 kt 3.14 kt Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Hungary or Trinidad and Tobago?
Hungary, at 15.68 kt against 13.3 kt in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Hungary and Trinidad and Tobago?
2.38 kt, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Trinidad and Tobago?
6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Hungary ranks 29th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 30th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/hungary/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/hungary/trinidad-and-tobago/">Hungary vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.