Russian Federation vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Russian Federation
10.57 kt
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
13.3 kt
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
32nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
30th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Trinidad and Tobago
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 13.3 kt against 10.57 kt in Russian Federation, a difference of 2.73 kt.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.3 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 32nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 30th of 59 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 42.15 kt 11.18 kt 30.97 kt Russian Federation
2000s 32.21 kt 11.59 kt 20.62 kt Russian Federation
2010s 14.23 kt 12.76 kt 1.47 kt Russian Federation
2020s 12.07 kt 13.16 kt 1.09 kt Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Russian Federation or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 13.3 kt against 10.57 kt in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Russian Federation and Trinidad and Tobago?
2.73 kt, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Russian Federation ranks 32nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 30th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/russian-federation-2/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/russian-federation-2/trinidad-and-tobago/">Russian Federation vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.