Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 18.61 % change on previous year against 1.9 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 16.71 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 9.8 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.33 % change on previous year | 2.52 % change on previous year | 0.8122 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 2.81 % change on previous year | 1.09 % change on previous year | 1.72 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -1.75 % change on previous year | 0.2253 % change on previous year | 1.98 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1990s | 1.48 % change on previous year | 2.35 % change on previous year | 0.864 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.5323 % change on previous year | 1.9 % change on previous year | 1.37 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | -0.8874 % change on previous year | 2.6 % change on previous year | 3.48 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 4.31 % change on previous year | 1.94 % change on previous year | 2.37 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 18.61 % change on previous year against 1.9 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 16.71 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.