Australia vs Costa Rica: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia
23.62 % change on previous year
in 2023
Costa Rica
22.21 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
1st
Costa Rica rank
2nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia
  • Costa Rica
-50050100150196219922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 23.62 % change on previous year against 22.21 % change on previous year in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.41 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Costa Rica ranks 2nd of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 3.05 % change on previous year 5.21 % change on previous year 2.15 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1970s 3.75 % change on previous year 3.89 % change on previous year 0.1466 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1980s -1.83 % change on previous year 0.451 % change on previous year 2.28 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1990s 1.66 % change on previous year -6.68 % change on previous year 8.34 % change on previous year Australia
2000s 0.7476 % change on previous year -3 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year Australia
2010s -1.03 % change on previous year 3.41 % change on previous year 4.44 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2020s 5.65 % change on previous year 27.47 % change on previous year 21.82 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Costa Rica?
Australia, at 23.62 % change on previous year against 22.21 % change on previous year in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Costa Rica?
1.41 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Costa Rica?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Australia and Costa Rica rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 1st and Costa Rica ranks 2nd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Costa Rica: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/australia/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/australia/costa-rica/">Australia vs Costa Rica: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,424 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.