Belarus vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belarus
-0.2973 % change on previous year
in 2023
Saint Lucia
-0.3058 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belarus rank
125th
Saint Lucia rank
126th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Belarus
  • Saint Lucia
-20-10010196219922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -0.2973 % change on previous year against -0.3058 % change on previous year in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0085 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Belarus ranks 125th and Saint Lucia ranks 126th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s -6.21 % change on previous year 0.0808 % change on previous year 6.29 % change on previous year Saint Lucia
2000s -0.2264 % change on previous year -1.06 % change on previous year 0.8332 % change on previous year Belarus
2010s 0.4613 % change on previous year -0.4133 % change on previous year 0.8747 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s -0.4132 % change on previous year -0.0211 % change on previous year 0.3921 % change on previous year Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Saint Lucia?
Belarus, at -0.2973 % change on previous year against -0.3058 % change on previous year in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Saint Lucia?
0.0085 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Saint Lucia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Saint Lucia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 125th and Saint Lucia ranks 126th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/belarus/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/belarus/st-lucia/">Belarus vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,424 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.