Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Ecuador
-5.38 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia
-5.52 % change on previous year
in 2023
Ecuador rank
181st
Latvia rank
184th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
-60-40-20020196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -5.38 % change on previous year against -5.52 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.14 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 181st and Latvia ranks 184th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6108 % change on previous year -17.2 % change on previous year 17.81 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 0.4179 % change on previous year 1.12 % change on previous year 0.6999 % change on previous year Latvia
2010s -2.19 % change on previous year 2.08 % change on previous year 4.27 % change on previous year Latvia
2020s -3.36 % change on previous year -0.7325 % change on previous year 2.62 % change on previous year Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Ecuador or Latvia?
Ecuador, at -5.38 % change on previous year against -5.52 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Ecuador and Latvia?
0.14 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Ecuador ranks 181st and Latvia ranks 184th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,424 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.