Guatemala vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Guatemala
1.37 % change on previous year
in 2023
Uzbekistan
1.49 % change on previous year
in 2023
Guatemala rank
63rd
Uzbekistan rank
61st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Uzbekistan
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 1.49 % change on previous year against 1.37 % change on previous year in Guatemala, a difference of 0.12 % change on previous year.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 63rd and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 1.91 % change on previous year -0.2258 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year Guatemala
2000s 2.14 % change on previous year 4.89 % change on previous year 2.75 % change on previous year Uzbekistan
2010s 2.44 % change on previous year 5.34 % change on previous year 2.9 % change on previous year Uzbekistan
2020s 1.21 % change on previous year 1.8 % change on previous year 0.5883 % change on previous year Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Guatemala or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 1.49 % change on previous year against 1.37 % change on previous year in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Guatemala and Uzbekistan?
0.12 % change on previous year, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Uzbekistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Guatemala ranks 63rd and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/uzbekistan/">Guatemala vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,424 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.