Liberia vs Micronesia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Liberia
1.81 % change on previous year
in 2023
Micronesia
1.82 % change on previous year
in 2023
Liberia rank
57th
Micronesia rank
54th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Liberia
  • Micronesia
-5-2.502.557.5196219922023

How they compare

Micronesia currently reports 1.82 % change on previous year against 1.81 % change on previous year in Liberia, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Micronesia ahead.

Liberia ranks 57th and Micronesia ranks 54th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Micronesia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4426 % change on previous year -0.1227 % change on previous year 0.3199 % change on previous year Micronesia
2000s 0.831 % change on previous year 0.656 % change on previous year 0.175 % change on previous year Liberia
2010s 0.9067 % change on previous year 0.9891 % change on previous year 0.0824 % change on previous year Micronesia
2020s 1.55 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year 0.0466 % change on previous year Micronesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Liberia or Micronesia?
Micronesia, at 1.82 % change on previous year against 1.81 % change on previous year in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Liberia and Micronesia?
0.01 % change on previous year, with Micronesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Micronesia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Micronesia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Liberia ranks 57th and Micronesia ranks 54th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Micronesia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/liberia/micronesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/liberia/micronesia/">Liberia vs Micronesia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,424 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.