Mauritius vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Mauritius
-25.85 % change on previous year
in 2023
Palestine
-31.51 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius rank
204th
Palestine rank
205th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Palestine
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -25.85 % change on previous year against -31.51 % change on previous year in Palestine, a difference of 5.66 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Palestine ahead.

Mauritius ranks 204th and Palestine ranks 205th of 209 countries.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 3.08 % change on previous year 11.56 % change on previous year 8.48 % change on previous year Palestine
2000s -9.63 % change on previous year 2.41 % change on previous year 12.04 % change on previous year Palestine
2010s 3.54 % change on previous year 7.51 % change on previous year 3.97 % change on previous year Palestine
2020s 33.74 % change on previous year 38.91 % change on previous year 5.16 % change on previous year Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Mauritius or Palestine?
Mauritius, at -25.85 % change on previous year against -31.51 % change on previous year in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Mauritius and Palestine?
5.66 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Mauritius ranks 204th and Palestine ranks 205th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/west-bank-and-gaza/">Mauritius vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,424 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.