Argentina vs Australia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Argentina
0.0023 kt per person
in 2023
Australia
0.0025 kt per person
in 2023
Argentina rank
5th
Australia rank
3rd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0025 kt per person against 0.0023 kt per person in Argentina, a difference of 0.0002 kt per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 5th and Australia ranks 3rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Australia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0039 kt per person 0.0032 kt per person 0.0007 kt per person Argentina
1970s 0.0041 kt per person 0.0046 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person Australia
1980s 0.0034 kt per person 0.0032 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Argentina
1990s 0.0028 kt per person 0.0031 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person Australia
2000s 0.0027 kt per person 0.003 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person Australia
2010s 0.0023 kt per person 0.0026 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person Australia
2020s 0.0023 kt per person 0.0022 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Argentina or Australia?
Australia, at 0.0025 kt per person against 0.0023 kt per person in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Argentina and Australia?
0.0002 kt per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Australia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Argentina ranks 5th and Australia ranks 3rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/argentina/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/argentina/australia/">Argentina vs Australia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.