How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mauritius?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bahamas vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Bahamas

0 kt per person

in 2023

Mauritius

0 kt per person

in 2023

Bahamas rank

165th

Mauritius rank

166th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Bahamas
Mauritius

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Bahamas ranks 165th and Mauritius ranks 166th of 167 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bahamas	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
1970s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
1980s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
1990s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Bahamas or Mauritius?: Bahamas, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Bahamas and Mauritius?: 0 kt per person, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mauritius?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Mauritius rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Bahamas ranks 165th and Mauritius ranks 166th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/bahamas-the/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/bahamas-the/mauritius/">Bahamas vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.