Belarus vs Guinea: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Belarus
0.0007 kt per person
in 2023
Guinea
0.0007 kt per person
in 2023
Belarus rank
16th
Guinea rank
15th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Belarus
  • Guinea
000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.0007 kt per person against 0.0007 kt per person in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 16th and Guinea ranks 15th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person Belarus
2000s 0.0005 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Belarus
2010s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person 0 kt per person Belarus
2020s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0007 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Guinea?
Guinea, at 0.0007 kt per person against 0.0007 kt per person in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Guinea?
0 kt per person, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Guinea rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 16th and Guinea ranks 15th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/guinea/">Belarus vs Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.