Belarus vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Belarus
0.0007 kt per person
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0006 kt per person
in 2023
Belarus rank
16th
New Caledonia rank
17th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Belarus
  • New Caledonia
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.0030.003196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0007 kt per person against 0.0006 kt per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0001 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Belarus ranks 16th and New Caledonia ranks 17th of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0013 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.0005 kt per person 0.001 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0007 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0007 kt per person 0 kt per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or New Caledonia?
Belarus, at 0.0007 kt per person against 0.0006 kt per person in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and New Caledonia?
0.0001 kt per person, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and New Caledonia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 16th and New Caledonia ranks 17th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/new-caledonia/">Belarus vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.