Cuba vs Eritrea: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Cuba
0.0006 kt per person
in 2023
Eritrea
0.0005 kt per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
24th
Eritrea rank
26th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Cuba
  • Eritrea
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0006 kt per person against 0.0005 kt per person in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0001 kt per person.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Cuba ranks 24th and Eritrea ranks 26th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0009 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Eritrea
2000s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0007 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Eritrea
2010s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Cuba
2020s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0 kt per person Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Cuba or Eritrea?
Cuba, at 0.0006 kt per person against 0.0005 kt per person in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Cuba and Eritrea?
0.0001 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eritrea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Eritrea rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Cuba ranks 24th and Eritrea ranks 26th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Eritrea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cuba/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cuba/eritrea/">Cuba vs Eritrea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.