Cuba vs Panama: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Cuba
0.0006 kt per person
in 2023
Panama
0.0006 kt per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
24th
Panama rank
21st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Cuba
  • Panama
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0006 kt per person against 0.0006 kt per person in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 24th and Panama ranks 21st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0014 kt per person 0.0013 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Cuba
1970s 0.0011 kt per person 0.0015 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person Panama
1980s 0.0009 kt per person 0.0012 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person Panama
1990s 0.0008 kt per person 0.001 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Panama
2000s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0008 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Panama
2010s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0007 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Panama
2020s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person 0 kt per person Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Cuba or Panama?
Panama, at 0.0006 kt per person against 0.0006 kt per person in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Cuba and Panama?
0 kt per person, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Panama rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Cuba ranks 24th and Panama ranks 21st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cuba/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cuba/panama/">Cuba vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.