How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Jordan?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Jordan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Equatorial Guinea

0 kt per person

in 2023

Jordan

0 kt per person

in 2023

Equatorial Guinea rank

162nd

Jordan rank

161st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Equatorial Guinea
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 162nd and Jordan ranks 161st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Jordan
1970s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Jordan
1980s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Equatorial Guinea
1990s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Jordan
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Equatorial Guinea or Jordan?: Jordan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Equatorial Guinea and Jordan?: 0 kt per person, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Jordan?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Jordan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 162nd and Jordan ranks 161st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/jordan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.