Eswatini vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Eswatini
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
Eswatini rank
39th
Mauritania rank
40th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mauritania
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0004 kt per person in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Eswatini ranks 39th and Mauritania ranks 40th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0013 kt per person 0.0028 kt per person 0.0014 kt per person Mauritania
1970s 0.0012 kt per person 0.0012 kt per person 0 kt per person Eswatini
1980s 0.0009 kt per person 0.0008 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Eswatini
1990s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Eswatini
2000s 0.0005 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0 kt per person Eswatini
2010s 0.0005 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0 kt per person Eswatini
2020s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0 kt per person Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Eswatini or Mauritania?
Eswatini, at 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0004 kt per person in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Eswatini and Mauritania?
0 kt per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mauritania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Eswatini ranks 39th and Mauritania ranks 40th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/eswatini/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/eswatini/mauritania/">Eswatini vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.