Iceland vs Peru: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Iceland
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Peru
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Iceland rank
58th
Peru rank
55th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Iceland
  • Peru
0000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Iceland, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Iceland ranks 58th and Peru ranks 55th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person Peru
1970s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Peru
1980s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Peru
1990s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Iceland
2000s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0 kt per person Peru
2010s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0 kt per person Iceland
2020s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0 kt per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Iceland or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Iceland and Peru?
0 kt per person, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Peru rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Iceland ranks 58th and Peru ranks 55th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/iceland/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/iceland/peru/">Iceland vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.