How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Portugal?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Portugal: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Latvia

0.0003 kt per person

in 2023

Portugal

0.0003 kt per person

in 2023

Latvia rank

56th

Portugal rank

57th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Latvia
Portugal

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 56th and Portugal ranks 57th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0003 kt per person	0.0002 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	Latvia
2000s	0.0002 kt per person	0.0003 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	Portugal
2010s	0.0003 kt per person	0.0003 kt per person	0 kt per person	Portugal
2020s	0.0003 kt per person	0.0003 kt per person	0 kt per person	Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Latvia or Portugal?: Latvia, at 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Latvia and Portugal?: 0 kt per person, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Portugal?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Portugal rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Latvia ranks 56th and Portugal ranks 57th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Portugal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/latvia/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/latvia/portugal/">Latvia vs Portugal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.