Malta vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Malta
0 kt per person
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0 kt per person
in 2023
Malta rank
140th
Solomon Islands rank
139th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Malta
  • Solomon Islands
000000196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Malta, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Malta ranks 140th and Solomon Islands ranks 139th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Solomon Islands
1970s 0 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Solomon Islands
1980s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Solomon Islands
1990s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Malta
2000s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Malta
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Solomon Islands
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Malta or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Malta and Solomon Islands?
0 kt per person, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Solomon Islands rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Malta ranks 140th and Solomon Islands ranks 139th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/malta/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/malta/solomon-islands/">Malta vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.