Mauritania vs Samoa: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Mauritania
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
Samoa
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
Mauritania rank
40th
Samoa rank
38th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Mauritania
  • Samoa
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0004 kt per person in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 40th and Samoa ranks 38th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 6 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0028 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0.0024 kt per person Mauritania
1970s 0.0012 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0008 kt per person Mauritania
1980s 0.0008 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person Mauritania
1990s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Mauritania
2000s 0.0005 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Mauritania
2010s 0.0005 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0 kt per person Samoa
2020s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0 kt per person Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Mauritania or Samoa?
Samoa, at 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0004 kt per person in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Mauritania and Samoa?
0 kt per person, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Samoa rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Mauritania ranks 40th and Samoa ranks 38th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/mauritania/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/mauritania/samoa/">Mauritania vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.