How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Singapore?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Singapore: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Mauritius

0 kt per person

in 2023

Singapore

0 kt per person

in 2023

Mauritius rank

166th

Singapore rank

167th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Mauritius
Singapore

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Singapore, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 7.8 times Singapore's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 166th and Singapore ranks 167th of 167 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Singapore	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	Mauritius
1970s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
1980s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
1990s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Mauritius or Singapore?: Mauritius, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Mauritius and Singapore?: 0 kt per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Singapore?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Singapore rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Mauritius ranks 166th and Singapore ranks 167th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/mauritius/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/mauritius/singapore/">Mauritius vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.