New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

New Caledonia
0.0006 kt per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0006 kt per person
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
17th
South Sudan rank
19th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • New Caledonia
  • South Sudan
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.0030.003196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0006 kt per person against 0.0006 kt per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.

Across all 12 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 17th and South Sudan ranks 19th of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0006 kt per person 0 kt per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), New Caledonia or South Sudan?
New Caledonia, at 0.0006 kt per person against 0.0006 kt per person in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between New Caledonia and South Sudan?
0 kt per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and South Sudan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
New Caledonia ranks 17th and South Sudan ranks 19th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/new-caledonia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/new-caledonia/south-sudan/">New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.