Norway vs Tonga: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Norway
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Tonga
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Norway rank
60th
Tonga rank
59th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Norway
  • Tonga
00000196119922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Norway, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 60th and Tonga ranks 59th of 167 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Tonga Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person Norway
1970s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Norway
1980s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Norway
1990s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Norway
2000s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Norway
2010s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0 kt per person Norway
2020s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0 kt per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Norway or Tonga?
Tonga, at 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Norway and Tonga?
0 kt per person, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tonga?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Tonga rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Norway ranks 60th and Tonga ranks 59th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Tonga: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/norway/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/norway/tonga/">Norway vs Tonga: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.