Rwanda vs Suriname: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Rwanda
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Suriname
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Rwanda rank
110th
Suriname rank
112th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Rwanda
  • Suriname
00000.001196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Rwanda ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 112th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0 kt per person Suriname
1970s 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Rwanda
1980s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Suriname
1990s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person Suriname
2000s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Suriname
2010s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Suriname
2020s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Rwanda or Suriname?
Rwanda, at 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Rwanda and Suriname?
0 kt per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Suriname rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Rwanda ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 112th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/rwanda/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/rwanda/suriname/">Rwanda vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.