Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Samoa
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
Samoa rank
38th
Uzbekistan rank
36th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Samoa
  • Uzbekistan
0000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0004 kt per person in Samoa, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 38th and Uzbekistan ranks 36th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Samoa
2000s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Samoa
2010s 0.0005 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Samoa
2020s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0 kt per person Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Samoa or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0004 kt per person in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Samoa and Uzbekistan?
0 kt per person, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Samoa and Uzbekistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Samoa ranks 38th and Uzbekistan ranks 36th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/samoa/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/samoa/uzbekistan/">Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.