Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Turkmenistan
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
Turkmenistan rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
44th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Turkmenistan
  • Zimbabwe
000.0010.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0001 kt per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Turkmenistan ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 167 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkmenistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0 kt per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Turkmenistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 kt per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Turkmenistan ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/">Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.