Angola vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Angola
0.0049 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0055 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
123rd
Turkmenistan rank
120th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Angola
  • Turkmenistan
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0055 kt per square kilometre against 0.0049 kt per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 123rd and Turkmenistan ranks 120th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Angola
2000s 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0053 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Angola or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0055 kt per square kilometre against 0.0049 kt per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Angola and Turkmenistan?
0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Angola and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Angola ranks 123rd and Turkmenistan ranks 120th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/angola/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/angola/turkmenistan/">Angola vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.