Antigua and Barbuda vs Chile: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0066 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
0.0065 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
114th
Chile rank
115th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Chile
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0066 kt per square kilometre against 0.0065 kt per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 114th and Chile ranks 115th of 167 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0183 kt per square kilometre 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0119 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0227 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0158 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0469 kt per square kilometre 0.0077 kt per square kilometre 0.0392 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.039 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0321 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.035 kt per square kilometre 0.0085 kt per square kilometre 0.0265 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0074 kt per square kilometre 0.0072 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0072 kt per square kilometre 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Antigua and Barbuda or Chile?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0066 kt per square kilometre against 0.0065 kt per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Antigua and Barbuda and Chile?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Chile rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 114th and Chile ranks 115th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Chile: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/chile/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Chile: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.