Australia vs Belize: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Australia
0.0087 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize
0.0085 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
102nd
Belize rank
103rd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Australia
  • Belize
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0087 kt per square kilometre against 0.0085 kt per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 102nd and Belize ranks 103rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Belize in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belize Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0081 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0066 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0072 kt per square kilometre 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0055 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0083 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Belize
2020s 0.0074 kt per square kilometre 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Belize?
Australia, at 0.0087 kt per square kilometre against 0.0085 kt per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Belize?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belize?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Belize rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 102nd and Belize ranks 103rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belize: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/belize/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/belize/">Australia vs Belize: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.