Australia vs Kyrgyzstan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Australia
0.0087 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
0.0084 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
102nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
105th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Australia
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0087 kt per square kilometre against 0.0084 kt per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 102nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 105th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0073 kt per square kilometre 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0074 kt per square kilometre 0.0083 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Kyrgyzstan?
Australia, at 0.0087 kt per square kilometre against 0.0084 kt per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Kyrgyzstan?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kyrgyzstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 102nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 105th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kyrgyzstan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/kyrgyz-republic/">Australia vs Kyrgyzstan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.