How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Latvia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Australia

0.0087 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

0.0088 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Australia rank

102nd

Latvia rank

101st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Australia
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0088 kt per square kilometre against 0.0087 kt per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Australia ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 101st of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0073 kt per square kilometre	0.013 kt per square kilometre	0.0057 kt per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.0079 kt per square kilometre	0.0067 kt per square kilometre	0.0012 kt per square kilometre	Australia
2010s	0.0079 kt per square kilometre	0.0084 kt per square kilometre	0.0006 kt per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.0074 kt per square kilometre	0.0091 kt per square kilometre	0.0017 kt per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Latvia?: Latvia, at 0.0088 kt per square kilometre against 0.0087 kt per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Latvia?: 0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Australia ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 101st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/">Australia vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.