Barbados vs Panama: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Barbados
0.0364 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.037 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
38th
Panama rank
37th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Barbados
  • Panama
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0364 kt per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 38th and Panama ranks 37th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0608 kt per square kilometre 0.0239 kt per square kilometre 0.037 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.0614 kt per square kilometre 0.0336 kt per square kilometre 0.0278 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.0683 kt per square kilometre 0.0359 kt per square kilometre 0.0324 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.1151 kt per square kilometre 0.0347 kt per square kilometre 0.0805 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0508 kt per square kilometre 0.037 kt per square kilometre 0.0138 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0365 kt per square kilometre 0.0391 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.0365 kt per square kilometre 0.0369 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Barbados or Panama?
Panama, at 0.037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0364 kt per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Barbados and Panama?
0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Panama rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Barbados ranks 38th and Panama ranks 37th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/panama/">Barbados vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.