Barbados vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Barbados
0.0364 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0.0344 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
38th
Uzbekistan rank
41st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Barbados
  • Uzbekistan
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0364 kt per square kilometre against 0.0344 kt per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 38th and Uzbekistan ranks 41st of 167 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1156 kt per square kilometre 0.0126 kt per square kilometre 0.103 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0508 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0362 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0365 kt per square kilometre 0.0273 kt per square kilometre 0.0092 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0365 kt per square kilometre 0.0335 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Barbados or Uzbekistan?
Barbados, at 0.0364 kt per square kilometre against 0.0344 kt per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Barbados and Uzbekistan?
0.002 kt per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Uzbekistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Barbados ranks 38th and Uzbekistan ranks 41st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/uzbekistan/">Barbados vs Uzbekistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.