How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Eswatini: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus

0.0298 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Eswatini

0.0296 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

48th

Eswatini rank

49th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Belarus
Eswatini

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0298 kt per square kilometre against 0.0296 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 48th and Eswatini ranks 49th of 167 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0363 kt per square kilometre	0.0388 kt per square kilometre	0.0025 kt per square kilometre	Eswatini
2000s	0.0263 kt per square kilometre	0.0333 kt per square kilometre	0.007 kt per square kilometre	Eswatini
2010s	0.0303 kt per square kilometre	0.0334 kt per square kilometre	0.0031 kt per square kilometre	Eswatini
2020s	0.0301 kt per square kilometre	0.0309 kt per square kilometre	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Eswatini?: Belarus, at 0.0298 kt per square kilometre against 0.0296 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Eswatini?: 0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belarus ranks 48th and Eswatini ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Eswatini: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/eswatini/">Belarus vs Eswatini: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.