Belarus vs Gambia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus
0.0298 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
0.0308 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
48th
Gambia rank
47th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belarus
  • Gambia
0.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0308 kt per square kilometre against 0.0298 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 48th and Gambia ranks 47th of 167 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0363 kt per square kilometre 0.0395 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 0.0263 kt per square kilometre 0.0437 kt per square kilometre 0.0174 kt per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 0.0303 kt per square kilometre 0.0459 kt per square kilometre 0.0156 kt per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.0301 kt per square kilometre 0.0312 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Gambia?
Gambia, at 0.0308 kt per square kilometre against 0.0298 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Gambia?
0.001 kt per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Gambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Gambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 48th and Gambia ranks 47th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/gambia-the/">Belarus vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.