How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Israel?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Israel: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus

0.0298 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Israel

0.0291 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

48th

Israel rank

50th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Belarus
Israel

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0298 kt per square kilometre against 0.0291 kt per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.0007 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 48th and Israel ranks 50th of 167 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Israel	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0363 kt per square kilometre	0.0161 kt per square kilometre	0.0202 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	0.0263 kt per square kilometre	0.0164 kt per square kilometre	0.0099 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.0303 kt per square kilometre	0.023 kt per square kilometre	0.0074 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.0301 kt per square kilometre	0.0276 kt per square kilometre	0.0024 kt per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Israel?: Belarus, at 0.0298 kt per square kilometre against 0.0291 kt per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Israel?: 0.0007 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Israel?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Israel rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belarus ranks 48th and Israel ranks 50th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Israel: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/israel/">Belarus vs Israel: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.