Belarus vs Poland: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus
0.0298 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
0.0289 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
48th
Poland rank
51st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belarus
  • Poland
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0298 kt per square kilometre against 0.0289 kt per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 0.0009 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 48th and Poland ranks 51st of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0363 kt per square kilometre 0.0269 kt per square kilometre 0.0094 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0263 kt per square kilometre 0.0204 kt per square kilometre 0.0059 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0303 kt per square kilometre 0.0262 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0301 kt per square kilometre 0.0304 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Poland?
Belarus, at 0.0298 kt per square kilometre against 0.0289 kt per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Poland?
0.0009 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 48th and Poland ranks 51st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/poland/">Belarus vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.