Belarus vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus
0.0298 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Lucia
0.0321 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
48th
Saint Lucia rank
45th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belarus
  • Saint Lucia
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 0.0321 kt per square kilometre against 0.0298 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0023 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 48th and Saint Lucia ranks 45th of 167 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0363 kt per square kilometre 0.0382 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2000s 0.0263 kt per square kilometre 0.0321 kt per square kilometre 0.0058 kt per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2010s 0.0303 kt per square kilometre 0.0331 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2020s 0.0301 kt per square kilometre 0.0322 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 0.0321 kt per square kilometre against 0.0298 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Saint Lucia?
0.0023 kt per square kilometre, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Saint Lucia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Saint Lucia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 48th and Saint Lucia ranks 45th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/st-lucia/">Belarus vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.